Friday, March 26, 2010

Maine first state to ban ocean windfarming. Media yawns.

Sometimes reporters just don't grasp the big picture. Not surprising, as beleaguered journalists  find themselves covering ever more stories per day, and  with time enough only to assemble enough facts and a hook to fill a news hole, then off to the next. But this story seemed extraordinary. A case of not seeing  the forest for all the trees. First the backstory:

On March 24, 2010 By unanimous vote, the Maine Legislature's Utilities and Energy Committee sent a final version of LD 1810."An Act To Implement the Recommendations of the Governor's Ocean Energy Task Force", to the floor where it is expected to pass without difficulty and be signed by Governor Baldacci.

The bill  prohibits windfarming in state waters and directs would-be ocean windmill investors to join in an effort to build  floating offshore wind turbines in Maine and then tow them ten miles and further from shore for deployment in federal and EEZ waters.  
The decision to refrain from windfarming in state waters came after intense opposition from lobsterimen, groundfishermen, scallopers and shrimpers, objecting to the threatened  leasing away of their irreplaceable commercial fishing grounds  to absentee power utilities.

The bill also proposes  that the state market deep offshore wind as a special kind of "green ocean energy" that doesn't harm scenery and property values like  land-based wind farms do in Maine. 

The writer for the Kennebec Journal & Portland Press Herald, E
than Wilensky-Lanford,
 
made only the barest passing reference to the former and focused instead on the latter: the state wanting to persuade Maine business and academia to buy higher priced power that the offshore wind farm would generate  

The rather astonishing victory by fishermen, windjammers and other coastal interests in preventing  the closing of the state's marine commons is almost dismissed by
 Wilensky-Lanford's article. In hi article  Panel backs near-shore wind, tide power bill 
 he  wrote: "The bill set short-term goals of developing near-shore wind power, but now is more focused on deep-water projects.
"

Such understatement! the reader cannot tell from this article that there will be no windfarming in Maine state waters,. Can they?  
Tut tut, Ethan.

No comments: